Introduction to Comparative Politics
Purpose of Course showclose
Course Information showclose
Course Designers: Thad Oliver, Dana Schueneman, and Mark Hibben
Primary Resources: This course relies on a variety of readings and Web Media; below you will find a few of the major resources used:
- Global Text Project: Anol Bhattacherjee’s Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices
- MIT OpenCourseWare: Chappell Lawson’s Introduction to Comparative Politics: Lecture Notes
- University of Richmond: J. Dasovi?’s Video Lectures for The Comparative Method
- Open Library: Max Weber’s Essays in Sociology
Note that you will only receive an official grade on your final exam. However, in order to adequately prepare for this exam, you will need to work through all of the readings for the course.
Your score on the exam will be tabulated as soon as you complete it. If you do not pass the exam, you may take it again.
Time Commitment: This course should take you approximately 78 hours to complete. Each unit includes a “time advisory” that lists the amount of time you are expected to spend on each subunit. These should help you plan your time accordingly. It may be useful to take a look at these time advisories and to determine how much time you have over the next few weeks to complete each unit, and then to set goals for yourself. For example, Unit 1 should take you 15.5 hours. Perhaps you can sit down with your calendar and decide to complete subunits 1.1 and 1.2 (a total of 3 hours) on Monday night; subunit 1.3 (a total of 2 hours) on Tuesday night; etc.
Learning Outcomes showclose
- Identify and differentiate between various theoretical research paradigms employed in the social sciences.
- Apply comparative methodology to the study of political systems.
- Identify and differentiate between various methodologies used to compare political systems.
- Define the chief characteristics of a nation state.
- Identify and explain various comparative methodologies used to compare various political systems.
- Distinguish between unitary, federal, and confederal governmental models.
- Compare and contrast political cultures in selected countries.
- Compare and contrast political socialization in selected countries.
- Describe and explain patterns of representation and participation in selected countries.
- Compare and contrast the roles and functions of political parties in selected countries.
- Compare and contrast the role of interest groups in selected countries.
- Identify and explain governance and policy-making in selected countries.
- Compare and contrast the role of the executive in selected countries.
- Compare and contrast the role of the judicial branch in selected countries.
- Compare and contrast the role of the bureaucracy and the policy process in selected countries.
- Describe and explain the political economy and development in selected countries.
- Identify and explain political challenges and changing agendas in selected countries.
Course Requirements showclose
√ Have access to a computer.
√ Have continuous broadband Internet access.
√ Have the ability/permission to install plug-ins or software (e.g., Adobe Reader or Flash).
√ Have the ability to download and save files and documents to a computer.
√ Have the ability to open Microsoft files and documents (.doc, .ppt, .xls, etc.).
√ Be competent in the English language.
√ Have read the Saylor Student Handbook.
Unit Outline show close
Expand All Resources Collapse All Resources
-
Unit 1: Social Science and Comparative Politics
Effective comparative study of political systems is rooted in the scientific method. To start off the course, Unit 1 first provides an overview and brief history of scientific inquiry and research methods. We then build on these themes as we focus on the comparative method and outline several “positivist” models of comparison employed by political scientists.
Unit 1 Time Advisory show close
As you review the material, think about if and how the comparative scientific study of politics differs from scientific inquiry focused on natural phenomena. Can we study politics, for example, using the same research methods as a scientist studying microbes or global climate change? Why or why not? Also, should a study of comparative politics be objectively focused on understanding the world “as it is” or should it seek to derive better political models and outcomes?
Unit 1 Learning Outcomes show close
- 1.1 Social Science Basics
-
1.1.1 The Scientific Method and History of Scientific Inquiry
- Reading: Global Text Project: Anol Bhattacherjee’s Social Science Research: “Chapter 1: Science and Scientific Research”
Link: Global Text Project: Anol Bhattacherjee’s Social Science Research: “Chapter 1 Science and Scientific Research” (PDF)
Instructions: Go to link and download PDF. Read Chapter 1. Make sure you understand what differentiates a study of natural science from that of social science. You should also be able to distinguish between exploratory, explanatory, and descriptive research. Make sure you have a clear understanding of the following terms: rationalism, positivism, antipositivism, post-positivism, and critical theory.
This resource should take approximately 45 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: Global Text Project: Anol Bhattacherjee’s Social Science Research: “Chapter 1: Science and Scientific Research”
-
1.1.2 Social Science Theory and Reasoning
- Reading: Global Text Project: Anol Bhattacherjee’s Social Science Research:“Chapter 2: Thinking Like a Researcher”
Link: Global Text Project: Anol Bhattacherjee’s Social Science Research: “Chapter 2: Thinking Like a Researcher” (PDF)
Instructions: Go to link and download PDF. Read Chapter 2. Make sure you have a clear understanding of the following terms: theory, unit of analysis, variable, independent variable, dependent variable, intervening variable, deduction, and induction.
This resource should take approximately 45 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: Global Text Project: Anol Bhattacherjee’s Social Science Research:“Chapter 2: Thinking Like a Researcher”
- 1.2 Comparative Methodology
-
1.2.1 The Comparative Method
- Web Media: University of Richmond: J. Dasovi?’s “Ragin Comparative Method Part 1”
Link: University of Richmond: J, Dasovi?’s “Ragin Comparative Method Part 1” (YouTube)
Instructions: Watch the video presentation. Make sure you are able to define the comparative method and comparative politics. Also, think about why the comparative method is implicitly tied to scientific thinking.
This resource should take approximately 5:04 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Web Media: University of Richmond: J. Dasovi?’s “Ragin Comparative Method Part 1”
-
1.2.2 John Stuart Mill’s Two Methods of Comparison
- Web Media: University of Richmond: J.Dasovi?’s “Ragin Comparative Method Part 2”
Link: University of Richmond: J. Dasovi?’s “Ragin Comparative Method Part 2” (YouTube)
This resource should take approximately 8:21 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: Hebrew University of Jerusalem: David Levi-Faur’s “Mill’s Two Methods of Comparison”
Link: Hebrew University of Jerusalem:David Levi-Faur’s "Mill's Two Methods of Comparison" (HTML)
Instructions: Please read the linked material. Make sure you can differentiate between Mill’s “Method of Agreement” and “Direct Method of Difference.”
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Web Media: University of Richmond: J.Dasovi?’s “Ragin Comparative Method Part 2”
-
1.2.3 Varieties of Methods in Comparative Politics
- Reading: MIT OpenCourseWare: Chappell Lawson’s “Social Science Research PowerPoint”Link: MIT OpenCourseWare: Chappell Lawson’s “Social Science Research PowerPoint” (PDF)
Instructions: Open the link and scroll down to “Week II: The State and Regime Types”. Download slides and notes from week 2. Read the notes and the PowerPoint. Pay close attention to slides #5 and #6. Note that the study of comparative politics is non-experimental. Also note that there are various methods that fall under the non-experimental category. Be sure you can distinguish between cases studies, systematic comparisons, and cross sectional analysis.
This resource should take approximately 20 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Assessment: The Saylor Foundation’s “Unit 1 Quiz”
Link: The Saylor Foundation’s “Unit 1 Quiz” (PDF)
Instructions: Now that you have completed Unit 1, please click the link above to access a quiz that covers the entire unit. It may be a good idea to visit your notes briefly before taking this quiz. When you are done, check your work against The Saylor Foundation's "Answer Key for Unit 1 Quiz." (PDF)See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: MIT OpenCourseWare: Chappell Lawson’s “Social Science Research PowerPoint”
-
Unit 2: The Nation-State
As introduced in Unit 1,comparative politics enables us to understand how and why nations change, how and why governments in a particular part of the world compare to governments in a different part of the world, and other patterns and regularities between political systems. Before we can begin our work as comparatists, however, we need to learn about the basic unit of comparative political study: the state (or nation-state). In Unit 2, we first examine the history and thinking behind the modern nation state through the contributions of Hobbes and Weber. We will then discuss how states developed in our modern world, challenges to state sovereignty, the psychology of the modern nation-state, and compare totalitarian and authoritarian forms of the state.
Unit 2 Time Advisory show close
As you read through unit 2, reflect on the following questions. Why do we have or need the nation- state? How does the concept of sovereignty tie into the history and characteristics of the state? How has the nation-state evolved since its origin in 1648? Is there an optimum form of state rule? And finally, is the modern nation state static or evolving in its form and function?
Unit 2 Learning Outcomes show close
-
2.1 The State
- Reading: Constitutionnet: Justice B. J. Odoki’s “The Nature and Purpose of a National Constitution”
Link: Constitutionnet: Justice B. J. Odoki’s “The Nature and Purpose of a National Constitution” (PDF)
Instructions: Open the attached PDF article on this page by clicking on the red “Download” link and read this article in its entirety.
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: Constitutionnet: Justice B. J. Odoki’s “The Nature and Purpose of a National Constitution”
-
2.1.1 Defining the State
- Reading: MIT OpenCourseWare: Chappell Lawson’s “The State”
Link: MIT OpenCourseWare: Chappell Lawson’s “The State” (PDF)
Instructions: Open link and scroll down to “Week II: The State and Regime Types”. Download and read slides and notes from week 3. Make sure you can define what a state is and identify its primary functions.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: MIT OpenCourseWare: Chappell Lawson’s “The State”
-
2.1.2 The Treaty of Westphalia the Origins of the Modern State
- Web Media: Academic Earth: Yale: Steven B. Smith’s “Lecture 12: The Sovereign State: Hobbes, Leviathan”
Link: Academic Earth: Yale: Steven B. Smith’s “Lecture 12: The Sovereign State: Hobbes, Leviathan” (YouTube)
Instructions: Start at 5:30 and watch to 7:30 of the lecture. Make sure you are clear on the origins and date of the Treaty of Westphalia. Why is the Treaty of Westphalia considered the birth of nation-state system?
This resource should take approximately 15 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Web Media: Academic Earth: Yale: Steven B. Smith’s “Lecture 12: The Sovereign State: Hobbes, Leviathan”
- 2.2 The Modern State System
-
2.2.1 Hobbes and Sovereignty
- Web Media: Academic Earth: Yale: Steven B. Smith’s “Lecture 14: The Sovereign State: Hobbes, Leviathan”Link: Academic Earth: Yale: Steven B. Smith’s “Lecture 14: The Sovereign State: Hobbes Leviathan” (YouTube)
Instructions: Watch the lecture. Make sure you are clear on how Hobbes’ view of the human behavior is tied to the need for a strong, centralized power.
This resource should take approximately 45 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Web Media: Academic Earth: Yale: Steven B. Smith’s “Lecture 14: The Sovereign State: Hobbes, Leviathan”
-
2.2.2 Weber and the Modern State
- Reading: Open Library: Max Weber’s Essays in Sociology: “Politics as a Vocation”Link: Open Library: Max Weber’s Essays in Sociology: “Politics as a Vocation” (HTML or PDF)
Instructions: Follow the link and select your preferred format to read the above assignment, which begins on page 77. Max Weber defines the State as a monopoly on violence. In other words, states are forms of government in which—even when not at war—there is an implicit assumption that internal peace is maintained by the potential threat of violence by the police and government.
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: Open Library: Max Weber’s Essays in Sociology: “Politics as a Vocation”
-
2.2.3 Growth of the State System after the Second World War
- Reading: Beyond Intractability.org: Eric Brahm’s “The Concept of Sovereignty”Link: Beyond Intractability.org: Eric Brahm’s "The Concept of Sovereignty" (HTML)
Instructions: Please read the linked essay above. Brahm outlines several of the challenges to sovereignty since the World War II. Make sure you can identify how the following phenomena have challenged sovereignty: human rights, globalization, and supranational organizations.
This resource should take approximately 25 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Web Media: YouTube: Philoctetes Center’s “The Psychology of the Modern Nation-State”Link: Philoctetes Center’s “The Psychology of the Modern Nation-State” (YouTube)
Instructions: Please watch the first 1:05 (one hour and five minutes) of Philoctetes Center’s “The Psychology of the Modern Nation-State.” Note that the participants in the forum focus on group identity and shared experience as key to maintenance of a strong nation-state. Are these more important than some variables such as geography, ethnicity, or language?
This resource should take approximately 1 hour, 5 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: Beyond Intractability.org: Eric Brahm’s “The Concept of Sovereignty”
- 2.3 Non-Democratic State Forms
-
2.3.1 Totalitarian States
- Web Media: YouTube: University of Richmond: J. Dasovi?’s “Authoritarianism Part One”Link: University of Richmond: J. Dasovi?’s “Authoritarianism Part One” (YouTube)
Instructions: Watch video. Make sure you can define authoritarianism and distinguish it from totalitarianism. How, for example, do totalitarian regimes incorporate ideology into rules? What are some contemporary examples of totalitarian states?
This resource should take approximately 8:04 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Web Media: YouTube: University of Richmond: J. Dasovi?’s “Authoritarianism Part One”
-
2.3.2 Authoritarian States
- Reading: Kellogg Institute for International Studies: Axel Hadenius and Jan Teorell’s "Authoritarian Regimes: Stability, Change, and Pathways to Democracy, 1972-2003”Link: Kellogg Institute for International Studies: Axel Hadenius and Jan Teorell’s “Authoritarian Regimes: Stability, Change, and Pathways to Democracy, 1972-2003” (PDF)
Instructions: Access link and scroll down to working paper#331 “Authoritarian Regimes: Stability, Change, and Pathways to Democracy, 1972-2003.” Download and read paper. Note that Hadenius and Teorell highlight five major types of authoritarian regimes: monarchical, military, no-party, one party, and multiparty. Make sure you are clear on the distinctions between these types of regimes.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: Kellogg Institute for International Studies: Axel Hadenius and Jan Teorell’s "Authoritarian Regimes: Stability, Change, and Pathways to Democracy, 1972-2003”
-
2.3.3 Sources and Trends of Authoritarianism
- Web Media: YouTube: University of Richmond: J. Dasovi?’s “Authoritarianism Part Two”Link: University of Richmond: J. Dasovi?’s “Authoritarianism Part Two " (YouTube)
Instructions: Watch the video. Note that Dasovi? presents three explanations concerning the source of authoritarianism. Be able to identify and differentiate between liberal, communist, and societal explanations for authoritarian states. Which of these explanations is most convincing? Also, what are the trends in authoritarianism?
This resource should take approximately 30 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Assessment: The Saylor Foundation’s “Unit 2 Quiz”
Link: The Saylor Foundation’s “Unit 2 Quiz” (PDF)
Instructions: Now that you have completed Unit 2, please click the link above to access a quiz that covers the entire unit. It may be a good idea to visit your notes briefly before taking this quiz. When you are done, check your work against The Saylor Foundation's "Answer Key for Unit 2 Quiz." (PDF)See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Web Media: YouTube: University of Richmond: J. Dasovi?’s “Authoritarianism Part Two”
-
Unit 3: Democratic States and Democratization
Unit 3 focuses exclusively on the concept of democracy. After defining the concept, this unit focuses on various attributes that characterize democratic states and differentiate them from authoritarian regimes. We then examine processes of democratization and the breakdown of democracy followed by the debate regarding the relationship between democracy and economic development. The unit concludes with a focus on the contemporary case of the Arab Spring.
Unit 3 Time Advisory show close
As you work through unit 3, reflect on the following questions. What differentiates democracies from authoritative regimes? What conditions facilitate democratization and do contemporary trends in the early 21st century support or undermine democratic states? Finally, are those who argue that democracy improves economic outcomes correct in their analysis?
Unit 3 Learning Outcomes show close
-
3.1 Defining Democracy
- Reading: SparkNotes: “Political Culture and Public Opinion”
Link: SparkNotes: "Political Culture and Public Opinion" (HTML)
Instructions: Please read all 6 “Sections” of this assignment. This reading covers subunits 3.1.1 - 3.1.3.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: SparkNotes: “Political Culture and Public Opinion”
-
3.1.1 What is Democracy?
- Web Media: University of Richmond: J. Dasovi?’s “Democracy Part One”Link: University of Richmond: J. Dasovi?’s “Democracy Part One” (YouTube)
Instructions: Watch the video. Make sure you can define democracy and differentiate between direct and representative democracy. Make sure you are clear on why the following dates/events are important to the history of democracy.
This resource should take approximately 7:02 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Web Media: University of Richmond: J. Dasovi?’s “Democracy Part One”
-
3.1.2 Criteria of Democracy
- Reading: University of Mississippi: Gang Guo’s “Industrialized Democracies”Link: University of Mississippi: Gang Guo’s “Industrialized Democracies” (PDF)
Instructions: Access the link and scroll down page to “file” under lectures for chapter 4 and 5. Download the file and read the slides. Be able to identify the three basic criteria used to classify democracies.
This resource should take approximately 15 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages aboveSee a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: University of Mississippi: Gang Guo’s “Industrialized Democracies”
-
3.1.3 Characteristics of Democracy
- Web Media: Oliver Ressler’s “What Is Democracy?”Link: Oliver Ressler’s “What Is Democracy?” (HTML, Adobe Flash)
Instructions: Please watch the first seven parts of Oliver Ressler’s 8-part film. This video illustrates the ongoing conflict between the ideal/normative definition and the real/empirical definition of democracy. A pure democracy would be one in which each citizen has an equal impact on his or her own governance. Though a pure democracy has never existed, governments have been constitutionally designed to identify who is permitted to speak and count based on democratic principles. You will learn that many countries bear the official title of a Democratic Republic—meaning that they strive toward democracy, but have a Republican form of representative government in which one or multiple layers of leadership speak for the people. Note that this video covers subunits 3.1.3.1-3.1.3.3.
This resource should take approximately 4 hours to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.The Saylor Foundation does not yet have materials for this portion of the course. If you are interested in contributing your content to fill this gap or aware of a resource that could be used here, please submit it here.
- Web Media: Oliver Ressler’s “What Is Democracy?”
-
3.1.3.1 Political Rights, Elections, and Accountability
Note: This subunit is covered by the reading for 3.1.3.
-
3.1.3.2 Citizens Right and Human Rights
Note: This subunit is covered by the reading for 3.1.3.
-
3.1.3.3 Representative and Participatory Democracies
Note: This subunit is covered by the reading for 3.1.3.
- 3.2 Democratization
-
3.2.1 What Causes Democratization?
- Reading: MIT OpenCourseWare: Chappell Lawson’s Notes and Slides: “Why Do Countries Become Democratic?”Link: MIT OpenCourseWare: Chappell Lawson’s Notes and Slides: “Why Do Countries Become Democratic?” (PDF)
Instructions: Open up link and scroll down to Session 8 (“Why do Countries Become Democratic?”) and download slides and notes. Lawson introduces six common explanations of democratization. Make sure you are familiar with each. Also, which of the six is most convincing?
This resource should take approximately 45 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: MIT OpenCourseWare: Chappell Lawson’s Notes and Slides: “Why Do Countries Become Democratic?”
-
3.2.2 Economic Development and Democracy
- Reading: IPC.org’s “Getting Involved: A Primer on Government Relations”
Link: IPC.org’s "Get Involved: A Primer on Government Relations" (HTML or PDF)
Instructions: Please read the above assignment. Keep in mind that the most important tool for a lobbyist is information; a lobbyist must be truthful or they will lose their credibility. Lobbyists can be volunteers or can be highly paid attorneys, and they can lobby anyone from a president or prime minister to the mayor or school board.
This resource should take approximately 30 minutes to complete.
Terms of use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the webpage above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: IPC.org’s “Getting Involved: A Primer on Government Relations”
-
3.2.3 The Rise of the Democratic State and the “Third Wave”
- Reading: CiteSeer: Larry Diamond’s “Is the Third Wave of Democratization Over? An Empirical Assessment”
Link: CiteSeer: Larry Diamond’s “Is the Third Wave of Democratization Over? An Empirical Assessment” (PDF)
Instructions: Please click on the PDF icon on the right hand side and read the above assignment. Make sure you are clear on what is meant by the “Third Wave” of democratization. What are the conclusions that Diamond draws? Is democratization expanding and deepening?
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: CiteSeer: Larry Diamond’s “Is the Third Wave of Democratization Over? An Empirical Assessment”
-
3.2.4 Democracies Today: The Freedom House Index
- Web Media: Freedom House’s “Analysis: Freedom in the World 2012”
Link: Freedom House’s “Analysis: Freedom in the World 2012” (Adobe Flash)
Instructions: Select the full report download, then select and read “Introduction,” “Methodology,” and “Checklist Questions and Guidelines.” After you have a clear understanding of how Freedom House ranks each country, select several individual countries, from different parts of the world, to see their respective rankings.
This resource should take approximately 30 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Web Media: Freedom House’s “Analysis: Freedom in the World 2012”
-
3.2.5 Case Study: The Arab Spring
- Web Media: The Foreign Policy Initiative: “The Middle East in Transition”Link: The Foreign Policy Initiative: “The Middle East in Transition” (YouTube)
Instructions: Watch the video on the Arab Spring and prospects for democracy in the Middle East. Based on the knowledge gained in unit 3, do you predict that democratic movements will be successful in the region?
This resource should take approximately 1 hour 30 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Assessment: The Saylor Foundation’s “Unit 3 Quiz”
Link: The Saylor Foundation’s “Unit 3 Quiz” (PDF)
Instructions: Now that you have completed Unit 3, please click the link above to access a quiz that covers the entire unit. It may be a good idea to visit your notes briefly before taking this quiz. When you are done, check your work against The Saylor Foundation's "Answer Key for Unit 3 Quiz." (PDF)See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Web Media: The Foreign Policy Initiative: “The Middle East in Transition”
-
Unit 4: Comparing Political Structures and Institutions
Constitutions are road maps for political systems. They are an expression of collective values, and they enable developing institutions to begin to maintain security and stability. Constitutions define political leadership, modes of representation, a legal framework, and the limits of a government's power. Though constitutions vary from state to state, they also have many similarities. In this unit, we will look at how those similarities have emerged to serve common needs. We will also consider the ways in which differences between constitutions reflect the varying values and interests of diverse constituencies. For instance, legislatures may be divided into different types of houses and may have different rules for selecting their members, but they typically have the same lawmaking purpose. We will see that these similarities and differences can be traced to specific reasons that enable us to better understand a given culture or society. For example, the way in which a government is organized often reflects the social stratification of the political community in question.
Unit 4 Time Advisory show close
This unit looks at each characteristic of government as a factor to be used in a comparative study of different governments. These factors are derived from not only the written constitution, but the types of political leadership and bureaucracy that have emerged in a society over time. In each case, we will discuss political factors with an eye toward comparison. We will identify the degree of bureaucratic privatization in a given system, discuss how the geography of a society determines the ways in which different levels of government interact, ask why certain governments tend towards immobilization in their policy-making, and explore how each of these factors leads to patterns in the political process over time.
Unit 4 Learning Outcomes show close
- 4.1 Comparing Constitutions and Government Systems
-
4.1.1 Importance of Constitutions
- Reading: Constitutionnet: Justice B. J. Odoki’s “The Nature and Purpose of a National Constitution”Link: Constitutionnet: Justice B. J. Odoki’s “The Nature and Purpose of a National Constitution” (PDF)
Instructions: Open the attached PDF article on this page by clicking on the red “Download” link and read this article in its entirety. What purpose does a constitution serve? What are the essential elements of a constitution? Also, make sure you are clear on differences between presidential and parliamentary constitutions and unitary and federal constitutions.
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: Constitutionnet: Justice B. J. Odoki’s “The Nature and Purpose of a National Constitution”
-
4.1.2 Checks and Balances between Branches of Government
- Reading: D@dalos: “Separation of Powers”
Link: D@dalos: “Separation of Powers” (HTML)
Instructions: Read the above assignment. Constitutions describe how power is divided among various branches of government. How has the role of the judiciary evolved over time in regards to separation of powers ?
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: D@dalos: “Separation of Powers”
-
4.1.3 The Role of the Executive Branch
- Reading: United States White House’s “The Executive Branch”Link: United States White House’s “The Executive Branch” (PDF)
Instructions: Read the linked entry. In presidential systems like the United States, the Executive Branch is a central point of political power. As you read through the White House’s description of the Executive Branch, make sure you are clear on the specific roles and responsibilities of the Executive Branch.
This resource should take approximately 30 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: This resource is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (HTML). It is attributed to Whitehouse.gov, and the original version can be found here (HTML).See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: United States White House’s “The Executive Branch”
-
4.1.4 The Role of the Judicial Branch
- Reading: United States White House’s “The Judicial Branch”
Link: United States White House’s “The Judicial Branch” (HTML)
Instructions: Read the linked entry. As you read through the White House’s description of the Judicial Branch, make sure you are clear on the specific roles and responsibilities of the Judicial Branch.
This resource should take approximately 30 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: United States White House’s “The Judicial Branch”
-
4.1.5 Presidential, Semi-Presidential, and Parliamentary Systems
- Reading: The Saylor Foundation's "Types of Democracy"
Link: The Saylor Foundation's "Types of Democracy" (PDF)
Instructions: Read the "Types of Democracy." Make sure you can distinguish the major differences between presidential, semi-presidential and parliamentary systems. For example, what are the basic operating principles of parliamentary, presidential, and semi-presidential systems? Are political parties more powerful in parliamentary or presidential systems? Also, be able to give an example of a country with a parliamentary, presidential, and semi-presidential system. Evaluate what you see as the strengths and weaknesses or each system. Is anyone of these three systems better than the other? Why or why not?
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: The Saylor Foundation's "Types of Democracy"
-
4.1.6 Types of Legislatures: Unicameral vs Bicameral Systems
- Reading: United Nations Development Project’s “Legislative Chambers: Unicameral or Bicameral?”
Link: United Nations Development Project’s “Legislative Chambers: Unicameral or Bicameral?” (HTML)
Instruction: Read the above assignment. Make sure you can answer the following questions. What characterizes and differentiates bicameral and unicameral systems? What is federalism ? Why are bicameral legislatures generally associated with federalism while unicameral legislatures are generally associated with unitary systems? Also, be able to give examples of states with bicameral and unicameral legislatures.
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.
See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: United Nations Development Project’s “Legislative Chambers: Unicameral or Bicameral?”
-
4.1.7 Limits of Written Constitutions
- Reading: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy’s “Constitutionalism”
Link: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy’s “Constitutionalism” (HTML)
Instruction: Read the above assignment. As the article discusses, there are several tensions around the role and limits of constitutions. Are constitutions best thought of as ‘living’ documents open to interpretation and change?
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy’s “Constitutionalism”
- 4.2 How to Design Multi-level Government
-
4.2.1 Understanding Diverse Populations and Public Opinion
- Reading: WorldPublicOpinion.org: Steven Kull’s “Listening to the Voice of Humanity”
Link: WorldPublicOpinion.org: Steven Kull’s “Listening to the Voice of Humanity” (PDF)
Instructions: Read the above assignment: it begins on the linked page and continues in the attached PDF (accessible clicking on the blue link that reads: “Read More”). What is your reaction to the “Citizen Advisory Panel” advocated by Kull? Spend some time looking at this web site that reflects a wide range of public opinion. Will public opinion play an increasingly large role in government policy decisions in the 21st century? Why or why not?
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: WorldPublicOpinion.org: Steven Kull’s “Listening to the Voice of Humanity”
-
4.2.2 Confederations vs. Federations
- Reading: The Federal Trust: Joschka Fischer’s “From Confederation to Federation”
Link: The Federal Trust: Joschka Fischer’s "From Confederation to Federation" (PDF)
Instructions: Click on the link above. As you read the speech, keep in mind the existing European Union of 2000 is a confederation, where each participating nation-state is sovereign. Under a federation, the federal government is sovereign. Also note that Fischer warns of some of the issues that have currently come to pass in the European Union. Based on Fischer’s speech, what would you predict he would suggest to solve the current crisis in the European Union?
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: The Federal Trust: Joschka Fischer’s “From Confederation to Federation”
-
4.2.3 Consensus vs. Majoritarian
- Lecture: Scandinavian Political Studies: Arend Lijphart’s “Consensus and Consensus Democracy Cultural, Structural, Functional, and Rational-Choice Explanations Lecture Given by the Winner of the Johan Skytte Prize in Political Science, Uppsala, October 4, 1997”
Link: Scandinavian Political Studies: Arend Lijphart’s “Consensus and Consensus Democracy Cultural, Structural, Functional, and Rational-Choice Explanations Lecture Given by the Winner of the Johan Skytte Prize in Political Science, Uppsala, October 4, 1997” (HTML or PDF)
Instructions: Read the above assignment. To view the PDF version, click the link above, then click on “.pdf” at the top of the page. How does Lijphart define consensus democracy?
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Lecture: Scandinavian Political Studies: Arend Lijphart’s “Consensus and Consensus Democracy Cultural, Structural, Functional, and Rational-Choice Explanations Lecture Given by the Winner of the Johan Skytte Prize in Political Science, Uppsala, October 4, 1997”
-
4.2.4 Direct Democracy: Evaluation and Feedback
- Reading: Ace Electoral Knowledge Network's "Direct Democracy Options"
Link: Ace Electoral Knowledge Network's "Direct Democracy Options" (PDF)
Instructions: Please complete the reading in its entirety, which includes the sections on Direct Democracy Options, Referendums, Initiatives, and Recalls.
Terms of Use: This resource is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-ShareAlike License. This work is attributed to the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, and you can access the full original document here. (HTML)See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: Ace Electoral Knowledge Network's "Direct Democracy Options"
- 4.3 Bureaucracy
-
4.3.1 Defining Bureaucracy
- Reading: Open Library: Max Weber’s Essays on Sociology,“Bureaucracy”
Link: Open Library: Max Weber’s Essays on Sociology “Bureaucracy” (HTML or PDF)
Also available in:
ePub
Kindle
iBooks ($12.99)
Instructions: Read the above assignment, which begins on page 196. Modern society is defined in part by the presence of bureaucracy. Weber defines the characteristics of bureaucracies and explains why they are part of modern social systems. As you read his essay, think about how bureaucracy impacts governance.
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: Open Library: Max Weber’s Essays on Sociology,“Bureaucracy”
-
4.3.2 Bureaucrats vs. Political Appointments
- Reading: The Washington Post: Shankar Vedantam’s “Who are the Better Managers – Political Appointees or Bureaucrats?”
Link: The Washington Post: Shankar Vedantam’s “Who are the Better Managers – Political Appointees or Bureaucrats?” (HTML)
Instructions: Read the above assignment. What does the research suggest regarding the performance of bureaucrats relative to political appointees?
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: The Washington Post: Shankar Vedantam’s “Who are the Better Managers – Political Appointees or Bureaucrats?”
- 4.4 Trends in Governance: Public Sector and Privatization
-
4.4.1 The Public Sector
- Web Media: International Labor Organization, LABORSTA: “Public Sector Employment”Link: International Labor Organization, LABORSTA: “Public Sector Employment” (HTML)
Instructions: On a piece of paper, make headings across the top: 1) country, 2) total employment, and 3) public employment. Select the above link and under the Statistics by topic subheading click on Employment heading then choose Public Sector Employment. Once on that page, select 2 countries—1 developed and 1 developing, and press Go to formulate your data. View your data by clicking the Your data selection box that appears. View the tables for “Public sector employment by type of institution and level of government, total and private employment ”in order to compare their total employment with their public employment. Can you figure what percentage of total employment is public employment? In what direction is the trend from 1999-2008 going? “Public employment as a percentage of total employment” is a ratio that is a common factor in political analysis. It tells us how big a government is relative to the country's economy and how “socialized” the political system has become. This factor can be read as an indicator of either social welfare or “immobilism,” a prolonged period of slow economic growth.
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Web Media: International Labor Organization, LABORSTA: “Public Sector Employment”
-
4.4.2 Privatization in Government
- Reading: World Resource Institute’s “Privatization: Can the Private Sector Deliver Public Goods?”Link: World Resource Institute’s “Privatization: Can the Private Sector Deliver Public Goods?” (HTML)
Instructions: Read the above assignment. What is the theory behind privatization efforts of public goods? What does the evidence tell us regarding the positive and negative impacts of privatization efforts?
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.
Terms of Use: This resource is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (HTML). It is attributed to the World Resources Institute, and the original version can be found here. (HTML)See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Assessment: The Saylor Foundation’s “Unit 4 Quiz”
Link: The Saylor Foundation’s “Unit 4 Quiz” (PDF)
Instructions: Now that you have completed Unit 4, please click the link above to access a quiz that covers the entire unit. It may be a good idea to visit your notes briefly before taking this quiz. When you are done, check your work against The Saylor Foundation's "Answer Key for Unit 4 Quiz." (PDF)See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: World Resource Institute’s “Privatization: Can the Private Sector Deliver Public Goods?”
-
Unit 5: Political Behavior
The behaviors of different populations influence, and are influenced by, political institutions. This unit focuses on how other (i.e. non-institutional) factors affect political prospects in different societies.
Unit 5 Time Advisory show close
Culture is defined as the sum of the ideas, values, beliefs, and norms that inform the ways in which you behave and lead you to anticipate how you will be judged for your behavior. We will see that cultural factors influence the political process in many different ways, often leading to different political values, differing degrees of alienation from the local process, and different means of mobilization. We will also examine how subcultures and recent shifts in political activism have influenced government of late before taking a look at interest groups, pressure groups, lobbying, the press, media campaigns, and nongovernmental and quasi-nongovernmental organizations. In these discussions, we will emphasize the use of the Internet in policy and administrative processes. Note that as we progress through this unit, we will discuss each of these topics in terms of their application in comparative politics. Finally, we will conclude with an introduction to comparative voting processes.
Unit 5 Learning Outcomes show close
-
5.1 Political Behavior and Political Culture
- Reading: SparkNotes: “Political Culture and Public Opinion”
Link: SparkNotes: "Political Culture and Public Opinion" (HTML)
Instructions: Please read all 6 “Sections” of this assignment. This reading covers subunits 5.1.1 - 5.1.3. How do we define political culture? How is it related to processes of political socialization? What is social capital? Why is this important in regards to democratic political participation and governance? What are the three forms of political participation?
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: SparkNotes: “Political Culture and Public Opinion”
-
5.1.1 How Do People Form Political Attitudes?
Note: This subunit is covered by the reading for subunit 5.1.
-
5.1.2 How Do Cultural Patterns Influence Institutions?
Note: This subunit is covered by the reading for subunit 5.1.
-
5.1.3 How Do We Measure Political Participation?
Note: This subunit is covered by the reading for subunit 5.1.
- Reading: The Saylor Foundation's “Public Participation”
Link: The Saylor Foundation's "Public Participation" (PDF)
Instructions: Read the above assignment. What are the different forms of public participation? How does public participation impact accountability and legitimacy?
This resource should take approximately 3 hours to complete.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: The Saylor Foundation's “Public Participation”
-
5.1.4 Political Mobilization and Alienation
- Reading: Internet and Politics: Michael J. Jensen’s “Political Participation, Alienation, and the Internet in Spain and the United States”Link: Internet and Politics: Michael J. Jensen’s “Political Participation, Alienation, and the Internet in Spain and the United States” (PDF)
Instructions: Click on the link underneath “Attached documents” to download the PDF. Read the above assignment. Jensen investigates the impact of the Internet on political participation. What does the evidence from the U.S. and Spanish cases suggest? Does the Internet increase political participation?
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: Internet and Politics: Michael J. Jensen’s “Political Participation, Alienation, and the Internet in Spain and the United States”
-
5.1.5 Political Alliances and Cleavages
- Reading: University of Mississippi: Dr. Gang Guo’s POL 628 (Seminar in Comparative Parties and Elections): Nick Sitter’s “Cleavages, Party Strategy, and Party System Change in Europe, East and West”
Link: University of Mississippi: Dr. Gang Guo’s POL 628 (Seminar in Comparative Parties and Elections): Nick Sitter’s “Cleavages, Party Strategy, and Party System Change in Europe, East and West” (PDF)
Instructions: Please scroll down this page to the list of references, and click on “Sitter, Nick”; open the link to read the above assignment. “Political Cleavage” is a key term used in studies of individual and collective voting patterns. Think of cleavage as the variable that splits individuals around a particular political issues. Four sources of cleavages are generally recognized. The division between urban elites and those in more peripheral areas; the division between religious and secular views; class differences between owners and workers; and industrial versus rural interests.
This resource should take approximately 4 hours to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: University of Mississippi: Dr. Gang Guo’s POL 628 (Seminar in Comparative Parties and Elections): Nick Sitter’s “Cleavages, Party Strategy, and Party System Change in Europe, East and West”
-
5.2 Civil Society
- Reading: Beyond Intractability.org: Charles Hauss’ “Civil Society”
Link: Beyond Intractability.org: Charles Hauss’ “Civil Society” (HTML)
Instructions: Read the above assignment. Civil society refers to all that goes on in public life, outside of institutions. Civil society includes interest groups, associations, non-profit groups, and the media. While extra-institutional, these groups are integral to the political process.
This resource should take approximately 1hour to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: Beyond Intractability.org: Charles Hauss’ “Civil Society”
-
5.2.1 Social Movements and Activism
- Reading: unrisd.org: Joe Foweraker’s “Grassroots Movements, Political Activism and Social Development in Latin America: A Comparison of Chile and Brazil”
Link: unrisd.org: Joe Foweraker’s “Grassroots Movements, Political Activism and Social Development in Latin America: A Comparison of Chile and Brazil” (HTML or PDF)
Instructions: Read the above assignment. What trends does Foweraker identify in regards to the relationship between grassroots movements and transition from authoritarian to democratic rule in Chile and Brazil?
Note: You can view and download this and other UN documents in PDF form by choosing the “Open PDF” tab on the right and completing a free registration.
This resource should take approximately 2 hours to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: unrisd.org: Joe Foweraker’s “Grassroots Movements, Political Activism and Social Development in Latin America: A Comparison of Chile and Brazil”
-
5.2.2 Lobbying/Government Relations
- Reading: Christian Science Monitors’ “How Washington Lobbyists Peddle Power”Link: Christian Science Monitors’ “How Washington Lobbyists Peddle Power” (HTML)
Instructions: Read the article. Is lobbying an essential part of democratic governance? Why or why not?
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: Christian Science Monitors’ “How Washington Lobbyists Peddle Power”
-
5.2.3 Quasi Non-Governmental Organizations (QUANGOs)
- Reading: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven: Greve, Flinders, and Van Thiel’s “Quangos-What’s in a Name? Defining Quangos from a Comparative Perspective”
Link: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven: Greve, Flinders, and Van Thiel’s “Quangos-What’s in a Name? Defining Quangos from a Comparative Perspective” (PDF)
Instructions: Please scroll down on this page to “DAY 1: …Materials to be read…” and then to the third bullet, “The issue of delineating the population,” and then to the first reading beneath it. Open the PDF and read the above assignment.
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pagesSee a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven: Greve, Flinders, and Van Thiel’s “Quangos-What’s in a Name? Defining Quangos from a Comparative Perspective”
- 5.3 The Media
-
5.3.1 Media Ownership and Multimedia Conglomeration
- Web Media: YouTube: pintopinto’s “Noam Chomsky - Manufacturing consent (Parte 1)” and “Noam Chomsky - Manufacturing consent (Parte 2)”
Link: YouTube: pintopinto’s “Noam Chomsky - Manufacturing consent (Parte 1)” and “Noam Chomsky - Manufacturing consent (Parte 2)” (YouTube)
Instructions: Watch both parts of the documentary on Noam Chomsky’s “Manufacturing Consent.” While Professor Chomsky is a controversial pacifist figure in American politics, his scholarly work on media ownership and the information environment is widely respected. As you watch both parts of the video, focus your attention on Chomsky’s arguments regarding the relationship between the U.S. press and U.S. government.
Watching this documentary should take approximately 2 hours.
Terms of Use: These resources are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Web Media: YouTube: pintopinto’s “Noam Chomsky - Manufacturing consent (Parte 1)” and “Noam Chomsky - Manufacturing consent (Parte 2)”
-
5.3.2 The Free Press and the Information Market
- Reading: FreedomHouse.org’s “Leaping over the Firewall: A Review of Censorship Circumvention Tools”
Link: FreedomHouse.org’s “Leaping over the Firewall: A Review of Censorship Circumvention Tools” (PDF)
Instructions: Please click on the link above, scroll down, and click on the hyperlink after “Download the full report” to open PDF file. Please read the entire text (76 pages). What are states doing to try to censor the flow of information on the Web? FreedomHouse is actively working with NGOs to subvert authoritarian state’s ability to censor information. Returning to the concept of sovereignty outlined in unit 1, should states have the right to censor the Web internally without outside interference? Why, or why not?
Reading and answering the questions above should take approximately 3 hours to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: FreedomHouse.org’s “Leaping over the Firewall: A Review of Censorship Circumvention Tools”
-
5.3.3 Regulating the Media
- Reading: University of Leicester: “Media History and Social Regulation”Link: University of Leicester: "Media History and Social Regulation" (PDF)
Instructions: Please scroll down on this page to the downloads section, open the PDF file, and read it in its entirety. You can skip the “Activities.” The article identifies six different explanations regarding why the media is regulated. Which is most convincing? Also, how has media regulation changed with the emergence of the Internet?
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: University of Leicester: “Media History and Social Regulation”
-
5.3.4 Electronic Politics (e-Politics)
- Reading: The Times: “E-politics Wins a Vote of Confidence”; Jean-Marc Seigneur’s “Local ePolitics Reputation Case Study”; and publicus.net: Steven Clift’s “E-Democracy Resource Links”Link: The Times: “E-politics Wins a Vote of Confidence” (HTML); arxiv.org: Jean-Marc Seigneur’s “Local ePolitics Reputation Case Study” (PDF); and publicus.net: Steven Clift’s “E-Democracy Resource Links” (HTML)
Instructions: First, read the news story from The Times. Then, go to the link for the case study and download the PDF in order to read the second document listed above. Finally, explore the “E-Democracy Resource Links” for examples. E-politics refers to the use of internet and PC technology in the field of politics. In modern society, people generally believe that electronic politics saves time and effort for public administration and consensus-building.
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.The Saylor Foundation does not yet have materials for this portion of the course. If you are interested in contributing your content to fill this gap or aware of a resource that could be used here, please submit it here.
- Reading: The Times: “E-politics Wins a Vote of Confidence”; Jean-Marc Seigneur’s “Local ePolitics Reputation Case Study”; and publicus.net: Steven Clift’s “E-Democracy Resource Links”
-
5.4 Voting System Factors
- Web Media: International Foundation for Electoral Systems: Laura Osio’s “Giving Voice to the Vote”Link: International Foundation for Electoral Systems: Laura Osio’s “Giving Voice to the Vote” (YouTube)
Instructions: Watch the above video and then use the links under the Multimedia Index to listen to Laura Osio’s other IFES podcasts. Access to voting is a core political right amongst the constituencies of developed democracies. In this section, we will look at how “suffrage” (the legal right to vote) becomes a variable within broader development indexes.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance’s “Electoral System Design: An Overview of the New International IDEA Handbook” and D@dalos: “Parties: Basic Course 1-5”Link: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance’s “Electoral System Design: The New International IDEA Handbook” (PDF) and D@dalos: “Parties: Basic Course 1-5” (HTML)
Instructions: Please download the first publication listed above (it is “free of charge,” although you will be asked to “register” with your gender and country) and read the above assignment; then work your way through D@dalos’ 5 Basic Courses on Parties.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Web Media: International Foundation for Electoral Systems: Laura Osio’s “Giving Voice to the Vote”
-
5.4.1 Voting and the Human Development Index (HDI)
- Web Media: UN’s “People First: The Human Development Reports”Link: UN’s “People First: The Human Development Reports” (Adobe Flash)
Instructions: Watch the above video. How does the level and quality of development impact political participation and voting in poor societies?
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Web Media: UN’s “People First: The Human Development Reports”
-
5.4.2 Controlling the Vote: Turnout, Suffrage, and Gerrymandering
- Reading: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance’s “What Affects Turnout?”Link: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance’s “What Affects Turnout?” (PDF)
Instructions: Read the above assignment. What are the main factors that affect voter turnout and participation?
This resource should take approximately 30 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: This resource is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (HTML). It is attributed to the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, and the original version can be found here. (HTML)See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance’s “What Affects Turnout?”
-
5.4.3 Proportionality and Election Thresholds in Parliamentary Systems
- Reading: en.academic.ru: “Proportional Representation”Link: en.academic.ru: “Proportional Representation” (PDF)
Instructions: Read the above assignment. In parliamentary systems, the number of seats given to a particular party is proportional to the number of votes that party receives. A minimum number of votes (a threshold) are required to secure any seats at all.
This resource should take approximately 30 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: This resource is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (HTML). It is attributed to en.academic.ru and the original version can be found here (HTML).See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: en.academic.ru: “Proportional Representation”
-
5.4.4 Protest Votes and Non-Voters
- Reading: Dark Politricks: “Are Protest Votes Wasted Votes?”Link: Dark Politricks: “Are Protest Votes Wasted Votes?” (HTML)
Instructions: Read the above assignment. Are protest votes wasted more in a parliamentary or presidential system?
This resource should take approximately 30 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: This resource is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (HTML). It is attributed to Dark Politricks and the original version can be found here (HTML).See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Assessment: The Saylor Foundation’s “Unit 5 Assessment”
Link: The Saylor Foundation’s “Unit 5 Assessment” (PDF)
Instructions: Now that you have completed Unit 5, please click the link above to access a quiz that covers the entire unit. It may be a good idea to visit your notes briefly before taking this quiz. When you are done, check your work against The Saylor Foundation's "Answer Key for Unit 5 Quiz." (PDF)See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: Dark Politricks: “Are Protest Votes Wasted Votes?”
-
Unit 6: Comparing Ideology, Policy, and Decision Making
This unit deals with ideology and decision-making tactics. We first compare five different ideologies that shape mainstream political party platforms and governance in contemporary democratic systems (conservatism, liberalism, Christian democracy, social democracy, and environmentalism). We then look at frameworks for understanding the policy process before discussing the ways in which policymakers garner feedback and use indecision strategically. The unit concludes with a focus on informal influences that shape government policy choices.
Unit 6 Time Advisory show close
Unit 6 Learning Outcomes show close
- 6.1 Contemporary Mainstream Political Ideologies
-
6.1.1 Conservatism
- Reading: GOP.com’s “United States Republican Party 2008 Platform”Link: GOP.com’s “United States Republican Party 2008 Platform” (PDF)
Instructions: Open the link and download the PDF of the Republican Party 2008 Platform. Conservative political ideology stresses the rights of individuals to hold, accumulate, and dispose of private property and champions order and stability. Are these themes expressed in the 2008 Republican Party Platform?
This resource should take approximately 30 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: Conservatives.com’s “United Kingdom Conservative Party’s Policies”
Link: Conservatives.com’s “United Kingdom Conservative Party’s Policies” (HTML)
Instructions: Read through the various policy positions. In what ways are the positions of the Conservative Party and the Republican Party similar and different?
This resource should take approximately 30 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.
See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: GOP.com’s “United States Republican Party 2008 Platform”
-
6.1.2 Liberalism
- Reading: Democrats.org’s “What We Stand For”Link: Democrats.org’s “What We Stand For” (HTML)
Instructions: Open the link and open up the issue areas under “What We Stand For.” Liberalism in the context of political parties focuses on the use of government to promote greater equality and opportunity in society while still supportive of capitalism. How are these positions manifested in the Democratic Party positions?
This resource should take approximately 30 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: liberal.ca’s “The Constitution of the Liberal Party of Canada”Link: liberal.ca’s “The Constitution of the Liberal Party of Canada” (PDF)
Instructions: Open the link and scroll down to “The Constitution of the Liberal Party of Canada.” Download the PDF and read page 5 of the Liberal Party Constitution. How similar in tone and content is the Liberal Party in Canada to the Democratic Party in the U.S.?
This resource should take approximately 30 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: Democrats.org’s “What We Stand For”
-
6.1.3 Christian Democracy
- Reading: cdu.de’s “The Christian Democratic Party of Germany”Link: cdu.de’s “The Christian Democratic Party of Germany” (HTML)
Instructions: Read the document. Christian Democratic parties are prominent in continental Europe, particularly Germany. How is the platform of the CDU different than what is seen in either conservative or liberal party platforms?
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.The Saylor Foundation does not yet have materials for this portion of the course. If you are interested in contributing your content to fill this gap or aware of a resource that could be used here, please submit it here.
- Reading: cdu.de’s “The Christian Democratic Party of Germany”
-
6.1.4 Social Democracy
- Reading: ndp.ca’s “The 2011 Constitution of the New Democratic Party of Canada”Link: ndp.ca’s “The 2011 Constitution of the New Democratic Party of Canada” (PDF)
Instructions: Open the link. Under “Party”, go to “Constiution” and download the PDF. Read the opening two pages of the NDP 2011 Constiution.How does the NDP define “democratic socialism?” How does the platform of the NDP differ from liberal platforms seen in section 6.1.2?
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: ndp.ca’s “The 2011 Constitution of the New Democratic Party of Canada”
-
6.1.5 Environmentalism
- Reading: gp.org’s “Green Party of the United States Platform 2010”
Link: gp.org’s “Green Party of the United States Platform 2010” (HTML)
Instructions: Read through to the Green Party platform. In what ways does the Green Party differ in its ideology than those discussed in 6.1.1-6.1.4.
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: gp.org’s “Green Party of the United States Platform 2010”
-
6.2 The Public Policy Cycle
- Reading: NCG: “Phases of the Public Policy Life Cycle”Link: NCG: “Phases of the Public Policy Life Cycle” (HTML)
Instructions: Read the above assignment. Note that this reading covers subunits 6.2.1 – 6.2.4. Make sure you are clear on the five phases of the public policy life cycle.
This resource should take approximately 30 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: NCG: “Phases of the Public Policy Life Cycle”
-
6.2.1 Agenda Setting
Note: This subunit is covered by the reading for subunit 6.2.
-
6.2.2 Debate and Compromise
Note: This subunit is covered by the reading for subunit 6.2.
-
6.2.3 Implementation and Choice of Means
Note: This subunit is covered by the reading for subunit 6.2.
-
6.2.4 Evaluation and Feedback
Note: This subunit is covered by the reading for subunit 6.2.
-
6.2.5 The 'Iron Triangle': Legislators, Bureaucrats, and Interest Groups
- Web Media: “Eisenhower’s Farewell Address” and noitv’s “The Iron Triangle – The Carlisle Group”Link: “Eisenhower’s Farewell Address” (YouTube) and noitv’s “The Iron Triangle – The Carlisle Group” (YouTube)
Eisenhower’s Farewell Address also available in:
Transcript (HTML or PDF)
Mp3
Instructions: Watch the above videos, which illustrate the theory of the Iron Triangle, then and now.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Web Media: “Eisenhower’s Farewell Address” and noitv’s “The Iron Triangle – The Carlisle Group”
- 6.3 Politics beyond the Policy Process
-
6.3.1 Informal Economies and Black Markets
- Reading: EconomicThinking.org: Gregory F. Rehmke’s “Parallel Societies”Link: EconomicThinking.org: Gregory F. Rehmke’s “Parallel Societies” (HTML)
Instructions: Read the above assignment. What is meant when we describe the informal economy? What are positive and negative impacts of informal activities relative to governance?
This resource should take approximately 30 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: EconomicThinking.org: Gregory F. Rehmke’s “Parallel Societies”
-
6.3.2 Corruption and Cronyism
- Reading: voxeu.org: Paul Romer’s “Cutting the Corruption Tax”Link: voxeu.org: Paul Romer’s “Cutting the Corruption Tax” (HTML)
Instructions: Read the above assignment. How does corruption undermine democratic processes and economic development?
This resource should take approximately 30 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Assessment: The Saylor Foundation’s “Unit 6 Quiz”
Link: The Saylor Foundation’s “Unit 6 Quiz” (PDF)
Instructions: Now that you have completed Unit 6, please click the link above to access a quiz that covers the entire unit. It may be a good idea to visit your notes briefly before taking this quiz. When you are done, check your work against The Saylor Foundation's "Answer Key for Unit 6 Quiz." (PDF)See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: voxeu.org: Paul Romer’s “Cutting the Corruption Tax”
-
Unit 7: Comparative Case Studies
This last unit will introduce you to area studies as they are conducted in political science and international studies. Please bear in mind that this unit is by no means exhaustive either geographically or topically. Over the course of this unit, we will apply factor analysis and other comparative methods we learned in earlier units to practical examples from 4different regions of the world (Africa, the Americas, Asia, and the Middle East). The classification for such area studies have developed out of the standard geopolitical organization of American political science. For instance, Asian politics is often divided into East, South, Southeast, and Central Asia sub-fields. Likewise, political scientists often divide Africa into the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) and sub-Saharan Africa. This unit will also look at how political elites and policy makers hold distinct views on democratization and modernization and how those views impact political conflict in these regions.
Unit 7 Time Advisory show close
Unit 7 Learning Outcomes show close
- 7.1 Africa
-
7.1.1 Colonial History
- Web Media: Al Jazeera English’s “Africa: States of Independence -- The Scramble for Africa”Link: YouTube: Al Jazeera English’s “Africa: States of Independence -- The Scramble for Africa” (YouTube)
Instructions: Watch the above video. The famous American political scientist Barrington Moore has argued that there is no single path to modernization. Even in the West, there have been many different models of economic and political development. What determines which route a country should take? In the case of African societies, there is a growing argument that the solution must come from within Africa.
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.
Terms of Use: This video is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. (HTML) It is attributed to Al Jazeera, and the original version can be found at here. (YouTube)See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Web Media: Al Jazeera English’s “Africa: States of Independence -- The Scramble for Africa”
- 7.1.2 African Case Studies
-
7.1.2.1 Cameroon
- Web Media: Frontline’s “Cameroon: Pipeline to Prosperity?”
Link: Frontline’s “Cameroon: Pipeline to Prosperity?” (Adobe Flash)
Instructions: Watch the video. What are some of the challenges that oil development brings to Cameroon?
This resource should take approximately 22.39 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Web Media: Frontline’s “Cameroon: Pipeline to Prosperity?”
-
7.1.2.2 Guinea-Bissau
- Web Media: Frontline’s “Guinea-Bissau: A Narco State in Africa”
Link: Frontline’s “Guinea-Bissau: A Narco State in Africa?” (Adobe Flash)
Instructions: Watch the video. What are some of the challenges that the drug trade and a weak state bring to Gunea-Bissau?
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the webpages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Web Media: Frontline’s “Guinea-Bissau: A Narco State in Africa”
- 7.2 Latin America
-
7.2.1 Overview of Latin American Development and State Forms
- Reading: LatinoStories.com: “US Department of State History of Latin American Countries”Link: LatinoStories.com: “US Department of State History of Latin American Countries” (PDF)
Instructions: Read the above assignment. The Argentinean political scientist Guillermo O’Donnell has compared Brazil and Argentina in the 1960s to explain bureaucratic-authoritarianism emerging at that time. Drawing on dependency theory (which assumes that resources will flow from poorer peripheral nations to wealthier core nations), he argues that dependent development in Latin America had led to sharpening class cleavages within Latin American countries. This explains both the dictatorships of the 1960s and 1970s as well as the growth of a technocratic elite that had emerged as a result of state-led industrialization. In Latin America, modernization has led to increasingly repressive governments. The rise in the popularity of socialist and revolutionary military movements is the result of backlash against the technocratic elite.
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: LatinoStories.com: “US Department of State History of Latin American Countries”
- 7.2.2 Latin American Case Studies
-
7.2.2.1 Brazil
- Reading: New York Times: Tina Rosenberg’s “To Beat Back Poverty, Pay the Poor”
Link: New York Times: Tina Rosenberg’s “To Beat Back Poverty, Pay the Poor” (HTML)
Instructions: Read the article. What is Brazil doing to address issues of inequality and poverty? How does reducing inequality potentially enhance development outcomes?
This resource should take approximately 15 minutes to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: New York Times: Tina Rosenberg’s “To Beat Back Poverty, Pay the Poor”
-
7.2.2.2 Peru
- Web Media: Frontline’s “Peru: Kiva's Web-based Microfinance Growing Up”
Link: Frontline’s “Peru: Kiva's Web-based Microfinance Growing Up” (Adobe Flash)
Instructions: Watch the video. Is micro-financing working in Peru? Can this model be reproduced in other developing states ?
This resource should take approximately 2 hours to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Web Media: Frontline’s “Peru: Kiva's Web-based Microfinance Growing Up”
- 7.3 Asia
-
7.3.1 Overview of Asian Development and State Forms
- Web Media: TED talks’ “Hans Rosling: Asia’s Rise -- How and When” and YouTube: KashifHKahn’s “Mahbubani: The Rise of Asia: Parts 1-6”Link: TED talks’ “Hans Rosling: Asia’s Rise -- How and When” (YouTube) and KashifHKahn’s “Mahbubani- The Rise of Asia: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, and Part 6” (YouTube)
Note: All videos are in YouTube format.
Instructions: Watch the above videos. Asia is considered a model of rapid political and economic development. This development would likely not have taken place without the authoritarian governments and dictatorships overseeing much of Asia; leaders in Asian countries argue that consolidated political power has made development possible. Debates about human rights and political freedom continue to be points of contention between Asia and the West.
This resource should take approximately 2 hours to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above. TED’s “Hans Rosling: Asia’s Rise – How and When” is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NonDerivative 3.0 Unported License. It is attributed to TED.com, and the original version can be found here.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Web Media: TED talks’ “Hans Rosling: Asia’s Rise -- How and When” and YouTube: KashifHKahn’s “Mahbubani: The Rise of Asia: Parts 1-6”
- 7.3.2 Asian Case Studies
-
7.3.2.1 China
- Web Media: YouTube: Authors@Google: Jeffrey Wasserstrom’s "China in the 21st Century: What Everyone Needs to Know"
Link: Authors@Google: Jeffrey Wasserstrom’s "China in the 21st Century: What Everyone Needs to Know" (YouTube)
Instructions: Watch the video. Some scholars argue that the 21st century is “China’s century.” What aspects of China’s political system and development are most problematic for its long term success? Will it displace the United States as the global hegemon?
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web page above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Web Media: YouTube: Authors@Google: Jeffrey Wasserstrom’s "China in the 21st Century: What Everyone Needs to Know"
-
7.3.2.2 Vietnam
- Reading: The Economist’s “Is Vietnam the Next China?”
Link: The Economist’s “Is Vietnam the Next China?” (HTML)
Instructions: Read the article. Some Asian scholars argue that a strong state is necessary for successful development and that authoritarian systems as seen in Vietnam and China are a key component to rising living standards across the region. Is this a reasonable argument?
This resource should take approximately 1 hour to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: The Economist’s “Is Vietnam the Next China?”
- 7.4 The Middle East and the Islamic World
- 7.4.1 The Colonial Division of the Ottoman Empire
-
7.4.2 The Creation of Israeli Statecraft
- Reading: Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs: “History: Foreign Domination” and “History: The State of Israel”
Link: Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs: “History: Foreign Domination” (HTML) and “History: The State of Israel” (HTML)
Instructions: Read the above assignments. What evidence does the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs cite to support its policy choices vis a vis its Arab neighbors?
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs: “History: Foreign Domination” and “History: The State of Israel”
-
7.4.3 Political Islam
- Web Media: shaykhspeersahib’s “Doha Debates – Political Islam”: Parts1-5
Link: shaykhspeersahib’s “Doha Debates – Political Islam”: Part 1 , Part 2 , Part 3 , Part 4 , and Part 5
Note: All videos are in YouTube format.
Instructions: Watch the above video. The American political scientist Samuel Huntington has criticized the idea that technological and political modernization leads to democracy. He believes that an impending “clash of civilizations” will demonstrate that education, mass communication, and urbanization may lead us to be politically active—and not in a democratic way. Using this framework, he concludes that modernization may actually lead to political disenchantment amongst the citizens of industrialized countries. In response, he calls for strong political institutions that will channel or suppress demands.
This resource should take approximately 1.5 hours to complete.
Terms of Use: Please respect the copyright and terms of use displayed on the web pages above.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Reading: University of Tampa: Norms & Ideas in International Relations: “Realist Constructivism”
Link: University of Tampa: Norms & Ideas in International Relations: “Realist Constructivism” (PDF)
Instructions: Read this anaysis discussing the main arguments in Samuel Huntington’s 1991 formulation of the Clash of Civilizations. Be sure to read and think about scholars analyses of both the strengths and weaknesses of Huntington’s propositions about contemporary international conflict.
Reading this commentary should take approximately 1 hour.
Terms of Use: This resource is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. It is attributed to Tangient LLC and the original version can be found here.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Assessment: The Saylor Foundation’s “Unit 7 Quiz”
Link: The Saylor Foundation’s “Unit 7 Quiz” (PDF)
Instructions: Now that you have completed Unit 7, please click the link above to access a quiz that covers the entire unit. It may be a good idea to visit your notes briefly before taking this quiz. When you are done, check your work against The Saylor Foundation's "Answer Key for Unit 7 Quiz” (PDF)See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Web Media: shaykhspeersahib’s “Doha Debates – Political Islam”: Parts1-5
-
Final Exam
- Final Exam: The Saylor Foundation's "POLSC221 Final Exam"
Link: The Saylor Foundation's "POLSC221 Final Exam"
Instructions: You must be logged into your Saylor Foundation School account in order to access this exam. If you do not yet have an account, you will be able to create one, free of charge, after clicking the link.
Note: This course recently underwent Peer Review, and thus, has had a number of edits made to it. If you were working through the course prior to these edits, and would like to take the previous version of the exam, it will contunue to be made available until May 10, 2012. You can access that version here.See a broken link? Please let us know!
- Final Exam: The Saylor Foundation's "POLSC221 Final Exam"
Questions? Consult the FAQ's!


